collaborative entrepreneurship
Using a straightforward approach, startups are basically a quartet of roles:
In other words, entrepreneurs design, engineers build, managers support, and investors think about tha bling. Understand that those are roles – one person can play more than one role, and the same role can be played by different people. So if you’re thinking about creating a startup – or is already in the process – you should pick people to play the roles that fit the moment you’re on.
But which is it? This post will cover the first spot you need to fill: associated entrepreneurs.
[ Entrepreneurs ]
What makes the best entrepreneurs? There’s a whole bunch of books, courses, lectures, and articles that try to define successful entrepreneurs, but my personal experience – and you will decide if that’s valuable – shows that entrepreneurship essentially boils down to three core characteristics: focus, passion, and altruism.
Those three words carry a lot of meaning, if you peel all their layers. So Entrepreneurs that combine those three things very well deserve the capital E: when they nail the right idea, they may change the world as we know it. They envision something that can make the world a better place, defend it with their hearts, and often endure because the idea is bigger than themselves.

[ Focus ]
Focus doesn’t only mean you can concentrate on a precise point. Focus enables you to keep track of what’s around you, but also to change your perspective on depth. The clearer you see what’s close, the less you see what’s distant – and vice-versa. Exercising focus is the key factor.
Entrepreneurs with strong focus abilities will keep a consistent and clear vision all along the product life cycle, despite of the resources they have available. They may change their vision a bit, they can even discard it in favor of another vision – but that will happen only to improve the product, and fulfill their original intent to make the world better. No matter if they’re good or not in dealing with people, focus will help them relate with their team, establishing clear goals and helping people pursue it. Either they do it well, or things will go wrong. Focus will also help them dealing with their investors – if the entrepreneur is strongly focused, he/she will learn how to make things go his/her way.

[ Passion ]
Passion comes second. The reason why it doesn’t come first? Simply put, dreamers without a plan will often perish.
People who are passionate about what they do, what they make, or the services they provide will rarely give up on their endeavour. In addition to that, passion will help an Entrepreneur to believe in the product – and that belief is key to get the consumer’s trust. Passionate Entrepreneurs inspire people around them, including the team they lead. In fact, even leadership is easier to exercise when Entrepreneurs use their passion properly: they evangelize people around them. Correctly used, passion will push the whole team towards the results on which the Entrepreneur is focusing.

[ Altruism ]
When an Entrepreneur pursuits the benefit of others, there is a combination of ethics, sense of community, and intent to contribute. Even when the original insight of the business happened to solve a personal need, real Entrepreneurs do it for other people’s sake. Money is a consequence, not the cause… Since altruistic people are excellent team players, that’s definitely a plus. Self-centered people may function well in specific scenarios, but they usually spoil it in the end.
On the other hand, people that are way too altruistic may never get there. Are you one of them?
[ End of part 1 - Choosing Entrepreneurs ]
Everyone tries to list 10, 20, 25 or 37 main characteristics of an entrepreneur. Well, I’m sticking to the KISS principle and condensing it all to 3.
Why did I choose those three features in particular? Because focus achieves faster results. Passion gives us stamina. Altruism will balance self-interest against the interest of others. Who wouldn’t want a focused, passionate, and nonegoistic person as their associate entrepreneur? Who could ask for more?
Wrapping up this first post, if you’re seeking your significant startup-other, find people that are strongly oriented to the three principles (focus, passion, and altruism) but will complement you with their area of expertise. For example, if you still lack a business model, talk first to experienced entrepreneurs or advisors on the area and maybe ask them to join you. If you’re all about sales, search for the guy that will keep the feet on the ground and take care of the product deployment… Check this post on finding a co-founder to go further into that idea.
A final note: due to several aspects that we’ll approach in the sequel posts, be extra careful when chosing fellow entrepreneurs that are also investors, technical, and/or subordinate to you.
In: startups
28 Apr 2009Just a quick note… MG Siegler has written today on TechCrunch about the KISS principle (refer to our rule #2). Check it out, and the comments are worth reading as well.
In: startups
16 Apr 2009Sweet – Ideablob is hosting an open-mic event for entrepreneurs to present their ideas and receive feedback. A speed dating for startups
Ideablob is a community of small business owners and entrepreneurs who bounce ideas off each other. They give feedback, advice and much-needed encouragement. Every month, the community votes on the best idea. The winner gets $10,000 to help their idea grow.

This happens on the site. Now, Bloblive will take place on Philadelphia today and other dates, and LA as well. If only I could check it out… We should definitely do something similar here, since our group already does it online.
In: startups
14 Mar 2009We work by very simple rules in our group. Maybe you will find them useful in your own projects…
[ Rule #1. KISS ]
Sometimes people simply know how to solve a particular problem. They feel the answer in their guts, they know that they’re on the right path, and they keep on going. But in other times, they overthink problems and their solutions.
In fact, your intelligence may often prevent you from achieving results – that’s when you think “someone probably has done it”, or “this app is too simple, it’ll never spread”. If you were a little dumber and didn’t ellaborate for so long, well, maybe you’d have succeeded…
So Keep It Simple, Stupid. Simpler solutions work best, cost less, and are easier to adopt. If they’re not that good, you’ll think of something better in the process of creating them. If you don’t think of something better, well, it didn’t cost you too much.
[ Rule #2. ASAP ]
We are tired of thinking cool technology solutions to everyday problems, and then finding out that someone else has launched the exact same product or service before we did. What might be the occasion then?

Whatever. When we start questioning ourselves “should we build this?”, it’s almost too late. The time to build is As Soon As Possible… So we focus, develop, and ship early. Better yet, we keep it simple, and it can be launched even sooner.
[ Rule #3. BTDT ]
That’s “Been there, done that”.
When we talk about features or aspects of a product, we combine brainstorms and guided discussion to achieve a particular goal. During those conversations, we often catch ourselves in the middle of a terrible sentence: “I don’t like it this way – why not the other?”
We’re not supposed to like anything – the user is. Since we are the ones who are probably overthinking the product (and taking too long to launch it!), we should turn to the user profile and put ourselves in his/her shoes – observing the problem and solution, and only then saying something about it. We will only be good references to the “I like (…)” sentences if we’ve been on the user’s position in the past.
So we’re not supposed to say “I like it better” such as in “I prefer blue ‘cuz that’s mah favorite”. Either one of us KNOWS it’s better and why, or one should stay put (if you’re a newbie, we’ll still accept “I know this seems rubbish, but do you guys think blue can be a better color?” for a couple of times).
We’re all allowed to propose changes, but further analysis only comes after we’ve BTDT.
[ Conclusion ]
This may seem too straightforward, but we’ve been guiding ourselves well so far and those 3 simple rules are all the process we have. Suggestions?
In: funding
4 Mar 2009VCs and seed capital funds are still recovering from the recent bad omen. Even so, people like Reid Hoffman preach that startups can right the economy by providing jobs and innovation at a very low cost. In his article “It’s the Startups, Stupid”, Hoffman mentions that small business loans have been proven successful in developing countries, referring to kiva.org for its business model that connects funders and entrepreneurs.
In regard to micro-lending, it is not widely known that Brazil - as a developing country and part of the BRIC - has government agencies that strive to make entrepreneurship blossom. I could mention several of them, but FINEP is one that hits the bull’s eye. Funded by the Science and Technology Ministry and active for more than 4 decades, FINEP destinates hundreds of millions of dollars every year to support tech startups, innovative products, and investment funds.
A recent project from FINEP is called Prime. It will give away US$ 50,000 to hundreds of startups – tax free and no return needed. The conditions are simple:
One of the main reasons startups fail is that the founders can’t work full-time on their products, since they need to work somewhere else to pay the bills. With Prime, that will be a little easier for 12 months.
Despite of that, there are cool Brazilian startups that have the potential to grow beyond our borders. But we still need this kind of government support, because the seed capital industry is not mature. Existing seed funds are all becoming VC funds to bite a larger piece of the cake, and the seed capital industry is left a little behind. Angels are still trying to form groups, but we have a long way to go.
Our initiative at Incubadora de Idéias tries to address this need. If you’re either an angel, seed fund or entrepreneur, get in touch.
A group that develops ideas until they're ready to become technology startups.